It is by no means a fast chipset unless you compare it with socket 7 machines. On the other hand there where more than one chipsets, but I don’t remember how much better BX was compared to the other versions. In any case Apollo was much worst than BX. VIA was great as long as there was no competition to show it’s chipsets weaknesses in performance. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. The BX was only one thing, and that is stable. I’m sure your experience is caused by a aforementioned shitty cheap no-mane via chipset board.
|Date Added:||13 December 2006|
|File Size:||68.52 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
360 controller on vista
Post benchmarks to prove you claims. We are completely unknown and degrees, experiences and system specs, convince no one. VIA had a bad name because it was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel.
Sunday, January 1st While the older chips were built on the 28 nm process, the KX series will be built on the newer 16 nm process, feature 4 or 8 CPU cores clocked at speeds of up to 3. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years.
I’m sure your experience is caused by a aforementioned shitty cheap no-mane via chipset board. And I’m not the only one that came to these results – there are similar ait on amibay, vogons and computerhistory forums. The replacement was a board with VIA chipset.
Check out my threads on Vogons marvin section – I benchmarked most slot 1 and socket chipsets last summer. And I have to prove nothing to you, as you have abi prove nothing to me. All you have to back up your claims are words. I do wonder if VIA aibt maintain their license in the future; Intel and AMD have a bunch of cross-licensing of x86 patents that keep them dependent on each other.
And this is something I remember very well, even after 18 years.
Abit VH6T Motherboard Overview – CNET
You can’t forget that kind of disappointment. These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. SiS was beating those first versions, with chipsets like the excellent in memory performance. Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person. Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor.
ABIT VH6T, Socket , Intel Motherboard | eBay
auduo With a fast AGP 4x card, the performs horribly. That’s why you always waited for the A versions. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me.
I have my experience auido tells me something completely different. I don’t have a time machine. They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases.
Abit VH6T Motherboard
There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue. I mean, I have seen in the past people posting BS vh6r in this forum and after they where getting ridiculed from many members, they where throwing degrees all over the place in a final effort to defend themselves. Holy blast from the past time Batman! But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly competitive products.
You really don’t have to convince everyone.
These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors. So, don’t be so sure.
In any case Apollo was much worst than BX. It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. Also if I cojtroller correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks.